January 14, 2007
Calling All Knitters
I need help! I don't know what to do. I am working on The Man Sweater.
The pattern calls for gauge of 26 stitches and 32 rows with a size 4US needles. I size 4 I'm getting 26 stitches and 26 rows. On size 3US, I'm getting the 26 stitches (it's a very stretchy fabric - 5x3 rib) and only 28 rows.
I held the back up to JB - since he figured out based on the color that it was for him. Anyway, the armhole shaping on the back looks a little short, but the body is long enough - I really don't want to add any length. I think what I'm going to do is refigure the increases/decreases for the sleeve and work the front up one size smaller.
If I switch to smaller needles for the sleeves, do I need to rework the back? It wouldn't hurt to be size bigger :)
Thanks for any suggestions - I'm off to rip and watch the overtime game. Actually, I just heard JB scream that Chicago won! Guess it's over 'til the next game :)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments
(
Atom
)
Gaylen, i would love to help you on this...but my mind is mush. And....you are a FAR better knitter than me, soooo.... ;o)
ReplyDeleteI would love to help you. Do you have a link for the sweater? Did the directions say something like knit the armhole until it is "x" length? Then the only thing would be shaping part. But without a picture of the schematic drawing, I would just be stabbing in the dark. I have always felt that stitch gauge was more important to get then row gauge because you could always knit more rows. HTH
ReplyDeleteLinda - the sweater is Leo from an old issue of Knitty.com. There is no schematic drawing. The biggest issue is that I have too many rows and the sleeves are too long overall! I ripped the whole thing yesterday! UGH. I showed photos and linked to the pattern here. http://gmariesews.blogspot.com/2006/12/and-now-debuting.html
ReplyDeleteThanks for any help you can provide - I'm frustrated!!! g
Gaylen, I can't remember if you emailed me before or after this post. How's the sweater going? Email me again if you need anything. x
ReplyDelete